MIL STD-810H-2022 含Change 1 美军标环境可靠性试验标准

VIP专免
NOT MEASUREMENT
SENSITIVE
MIL-STD-810H
w/Change 1
18 May 2022
SUPERSEDING
MIL-STD-810H
31 January 2019
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
TEST METHOD STANDARD
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS
AND LABORATORY TESTS
AMSC 10312 AREA ENVR
MIL-STD-810H
w/CHANGE 1
PART ONE
PART ONE-ii
FOREWORD
1. This Standard is approved for use by all Departments and Agencies of the Department of Defense (DoD). Although
prepared specifically for DoD applications, this Standard may be tailored for commercial applications as well. This
Change Notice to version G incorporates updates and clarifications to the earlier edition. The primary emphases are
still the same - (with the exception of Method 528) tailoring a materiel item's environmental design and test limits to
the conditions that the specific materiel will experience throughout its service life, and establishing laboratory test
methods that replicate the effects of environments on materiel, rather than trying to reproduce the environments
themselves. The goal is to provide an up-front explanation of how to implement the environmental tailoring process
throughout the materiel acquisition cycle.
This revision recognizes that the environmental design and test tailoring process has expanded to involve a wide range
of managerial and technical interests. Accordingly, this revision orients environmental design and test direction
toward three basic types of users who have distinctly different, although closely associated, interests: Program
Managers who, among other responsibilities, ensure proposed concepts and systems are valid and functional in intended
operational environments; environmental engineering specialists (EES), who enter the acquisition process early to assist
combat and materiel developer tailoring efforts by preparing life cycle environmental profiles and drafting tailored design
criteria and test programs; and the design, test, and evaluation community, whose analysts, engineers, and facility
operators use tailored designs and tests to meet user needs.
2. Part One describes management, engineering, and technical roles in the environmental design and test tailoring
process. It focuses on the process of tailoring materiel design and test criteria to the specific environmental conditions
a materiel item is likely to encounter during its service life. Annex A contains complete descriptions of environmental
engineering tasks, including additional guidance on Task 402, Life Cycle Environmental Profile (LCEP). These tasks,
along with management information in Annex B and EES guidance in Annex C, will help to ensure the environmental
design and test tailoring process is implemented and documented according to the disciplined, but flexible approach
to materiel acquisition called for in Department of Defense (DoD) 5000-series documents (DoDD 5000.01). Terms
used in this Standard relating to the materiel acquisition process are limited to terms used in the DoD 5000-series
documents; to avoid confusion and promote simplicity, service-specific terms/processes are not used.
3. Part Two contains environmental laboratory test methods to be applied according to the general and specific test
tailoring guidelines described in Part One. It is important to emphasize that, with the exception of Method 528, these
Methods are not to be called out in blanket fashion, nor applied as unalterable routines, but are to be selected and
tailored to generate the most relevant test data possible. Methods 500 through 527 now contain the Note, “Tailoring
is essential. Select methods, procedures and parameter levels based on the tailoring process described in Part One,
paragraph 4.2.2, and Annex C. Apply the general guidelines for laboratory test methods described in Part One,
paragraph 5 of this Standard.” Prior to the start of testing, all deviations as a result of tailoring shall be approved by
the proper authorities. It should further be noted that the rationale for such deviations and/or tailoring shall be recorded
in the test report.
To support the tailoring process described in Part One, each test method in Part Two contains some environmental
data and references, and identifies tailoring opportunities for the particular method. Some methods afford a wide
latitude for tailoring; some can be tailored up to established limits, and some have relatively few tailoring options.
Whenever possible, each method contains background rationale to help determine the appropriate level of tailoring.
Each test method supports the test engineer and test facility operator by describing preferred laboratory test facilities
and methodologies. Any specific tailoring information and values contained in these test methods should be
supplanted by more up-to-date field/fleet or program-specific information when available.
When applied properly, the environmental management and engineering processes described in this Standard can be
of enormous value in generating confidence in the environmental worthiness and overall durability of materiel system
design. However, it is important to recognize that there are limitations inherent in laboratory testing that make it
imperative to use proper caution and engineering judgment when extrapolating these laboratory results to results that
may be obtained under actual service conditions. In many cases, real-world environmental stresses (singularly or in
combination) cannot be duplicated practically or reliably in test laboratories. Therefore, users should not assume that
a system or component that passes laboratory tests of this Standard also would pass field/fleet verification trials. DoD
5000-series documents call for component technology to be demonstrated in relevant environments to reduce risk on
components and subsystems that have been demonstrated only in laboratory environments (DoDI 5000.02).
MIL-STD-810H
w/CHANGE 1
PART ONE
PART ONE-iii
4. Part Three contains a compendium of climatic data and guidance assembled from several sources to include AR
70-38, “Research, Development, Test and Evaluation of Materiel for Extreme Climatic Conditions,” (1979), Draft AR
70-38 (1990) that was assembled using 1987 Air Land Battlefield Environment (ALBE) report information,
“Environmental Factors and Standards for Atmospheric Obscurants, Climate, and Terrain,” and MIL-HDBK-310,
Global Climatic Data for Developing Military Products.
Part Three provides planning guidance for realistic consideration (starting points) of climatic conditions in the
research, development, test, and evaluation (RDTE) of materiel and materials used throughout their life cycles in
various climatic regions throughout the world. It is intended that this and related documents will help achieve the
objective of developing materiel that will perform adequately under the environmental conditions likely to be found
throughout its life cycle in the areas of intended use.
5. The US Department of Defense would like to thank the following individuals for their contributions toward the
development and publication of MIL-STD-810H Change Notice 1:
Army Air Force
Erick Acosta – White Sands Missile Range Dwayne Bell – Eglin AFB
Byron Alexander – Electronic Proving Ground Diane Buhrmaster – AFRL
Michael Barry – Aberdeen Test Center Cheryl Copes – ASC/ENRS, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
William (Bill) Barber – Redstone Test Center Lorraine Wright – ASC/ENRS, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
Michael Bartosiak – SDDCTEA, Scott AFB Sean Mortara – ASC/ENFS, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
Michael (Troy) Bedsole – Redstone Test Center
Daniel Bell – Redstone Test Center Navy
Thomas Considine – ARL, APG James E. Howell III – NSWC
Victoria Eveningred – Electronic Proving Ground Andrew Johnson – NSWC, Dahlgren
Mike Hale – Redstone Test Center Wayne Johnson – NAWC, Patuxent River
Anthony Ham – ATEC, APG Ron Merritt – NAWC, China Lake
Mark Horst – White Sands Missile Range Luke Martin – NSWC, Dahlgren
Matthew Lucas – Redstone Test Center Kevin Kovaleski – NAS, Patuxent River
Joe Nash – AMRDEC Edward Lipnickas – NAWC, Patuxent River
Randy Patrick – Yuma Test Center
Steve Sanders – AMRDEC OSD
Brendt Sigvart – Dugway Proving Ground Stephen Spadafora – OSD/CPO (Leidos)
Jamie Sullivan – Redstone Test Center
Eric Tessier – White Sands Missile Range Private Industry
Ken Thompson – ATEC, APG Vesta Bateman – Mechanical Shock Consulting
Weston Wilson – Aberdeen Test Center
Organizations
IEST – Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
SAVE – Shock and Vibration Exchange
The MIL-STD-810 Working Group wishes to recognize with great appreciation Mr. Ken Thompson, MIL-STD-810
Committee Chairman, for his exemplary leadership, guidance, and dedication to bringing this collaborative project to
fruition.
MIL-STD-810H
w/CHANGE 1
PART ONE
PART ONE-iv
6. This Standard is intended to be a "living document" that will be updated as new concepts, technologies, and
methodologies evolve.
Questions about this document’s technical content may be addressed to the following offices:
US Army Test and Evaluation Command, 6617 Aberdeen Blvd, ATTN: CSTE-CI, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
21005-5003; Commercial Tel: (443) 861-9338; DSN 848-9338; Fax: (443) 861-9927.
Aeronautical Systems Center, ATTN: ASC/ENFS, 2530 Loop Road West, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7101;
Commercial Tel: (937) 255-8517 or 904-5863; DSN 785-8517 or 674-5863; Fax: (937) 476-4546 or 255-2363.
Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division, ATTN: Code AIR-4.3.4, Patuxent River, MD 20670; Commercial Tel:
(301) 342-8049; DSN 342-8049; Fax: (301) 757-1213.
Naval Air Warfare Center, Weapons Division, ATTN: Code 476300D, China Lake, CA 93555-6100; Commercial
Tel: (760) 939-4667; DSN 437-4667; Fax: (760) 939-1065.
The Preparing Activity for MIL-STD-810 transferred from Air Force Code 11 to Army Code TE on 14 November
2008.
Comments, suggestions, or questions on this document should be addressed to US Army Test and Evaluation
Command, 6617 Aberdeen Blvd, ATTN: CSTE-TM, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5001; or e-mailed to
usarmy.apg.atec.mbx.atec-standards@army.mil. Since contact information can change, you may want to verify the
currency of this address information using the ASSIST Online database at https://assist.dla.mil.
(MIL STD-810H-2022 含Change 1 美军标环境可靠性试验标准,(共1107页),pdf,36.18MB,https://bjxwk.com/doc/165049/)
声明:本文档系会员上传,若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知,我们立即给予侵权申诉删除!
相关推荐
-
VIP专免2024-12-12 17
-
VIP免费2025-01-17 8
-
VIP免费2025-01-17 9
-
VIP免费2025-01-17 10
-
VIP免费2025-01-17 9
-
VIP免费2025-01-17 7
-
VIP免费2025-01-17 7
-
VIP免费2025-01-17 9
-
VIP免费2025-01-17 8
-
VIP免费2025-01-17 8
作者:老杨树
分类:国外协会
价格:20星币
属性:1107 页
大小:36.18MB
格式:PDF
时间:2025-01-19
相关内容
-
GJB 150.26-2009 军用装备实验室环境试验方法 流体污染试验
分类:中国标准
时间:2024-11-20
标签:实验室
格式:PDF
价格:8 星币
-
GJB 150.27-2009 军用装备实验室环境试验方法 爆炸分离冲击试验
分类:中国标准
时间:2024-11-20
标签:实验室
格式:PDF
价格:8 星币
-
GJB 150.28-2009 军用装备实验室环境试验方法 酸性大气试验
分类:中国标准
时间:2024-11-20
标签:实验室
格式:PDF
价格:8 星币
-
GJB 150.29-2009 军用装备实验室环境试验方法 弹道冲击试验
分类:中国标准
时间:2024-11-20
标签:实验室
格式:PDF
价格:8 星币
-
GBT 150.1~150.4-2024 压力容器
分类:中国标准
时间:2024-11-29
标签:压力容器
格式:PDF
价格:12 星币